Legal Opinion
Fink v. Weisman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1933No. Docket No. 8665PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] We granted respondent's petition for rehearing as to appellant Toplitzky to give further consideration to respondent's claim that the instruction which we held prejudicially erroneous to Toplitzky was…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Donahue v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.