Legal Opinion

Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1996No. 94-2045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The issue before this court is whether equipment used to perform FDA testing on samples of a pharmaceutical batch taken after the packaging and *656sale of the remainder of the batch is exempt from sales and use taxes as an adjunct to manufacturing pursuant to R.C. 5739.01(E)(2). We find that equipment used in stability testing does not qualify as an adjunct to manufacturing under R.C. 5739.01(R), as it is used after manufacturing ends.

Roxane challenges the failure to exempt the stability testing machinery from sales and use taxes as an adjunct to manufacturing. Because the use tax adopted the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Pfeiffer v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. OAMCO v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API