Legal Opinion
Newman v. Cornerstone National Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 27, 2014No. 1 CA-CV 13-0082PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 This opinion addresses whether a premium price is required on a written offer of underinsured (UIM) motorist coverage pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (AR.S.) § 20-259.01(B) (Supp.2012). 1 Plaintiff Katelin Newman (Newman) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Cornerstone National Insurance Company (Cornerstone). We affirm, holding no premium price is required for a written offer of UIM coverage to be valid.
¶ 2 In May 2011, Newman was seriously injured in an automobile accident. The policy limits of both her own insurance and the adverse party’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Ballesteros v. American Standard InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Katelin Newman v. Cornerstone National Insurance Company Dba Freedom National Insurance ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Wilks v. ManobiancoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Katelin Newman v. Cornerstone National Insurance Company Dba Freedom National Insurance ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 2015