Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiffs-appellants Ronald and Tonya Brookover appeal the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee Roberts Enterprises, Inc. (Roberts). The Brookovers claimed that Roberts was negligent in allowing its cow to enter the highway where it collided with the Brook-overs’ automobile. On appeal, they contend that fact issues exist regarding Roberts’s negligence and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 We view the facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Centennial Development Group, LLC v. Lawyer's Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.