Wilks v. Manobianco
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 The principal issue in this appeal is whether an insurance agent’s compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 20-259.01(B) (Supp. 2013), a statute that requires insurers to offer uninsured and un-derinsured motorist coverage to their insureds, bars an insured from asserting a professional negligence claim against an insurance agent for failing to obtain the under-insured motorist coverage the insured requested and the agent agreed to procure. As we explain, the statute does not bar such a claim.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
¶2 In 2001, Lesley Wilks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Ballesteros v. American Standard InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Quality Furniture, Inc. v. HayHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilks Et Vir v. ManobiancoArizona Supreme Court · 2015