Legal Opinion

Emco Investment, Inc. v. Vaden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 1982No. 6406-L, CA A22532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*764VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

In this appeal from a judgment in an action on a land sale contract, petitioner, the purchaser under the contract, challenges the remedy ordered by the trial court for the purchaser’s failure to perform. No assertion is made that a default did not occur or that the vendor is not entitled to relief. The vendor requested specific performance of the terms of the contract and, in the event purchaser failed to abide by the decree, a sale of the property.

To preserve the vendor’s equitable lien, the court ordered vendor to tender a deed into court and ordered purchaser to pay the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Renard v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Braunstein v. TrottierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Priddy & Chambers v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. McCracken v. Walnut Park Garage, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Herrmann v. ChurchillOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vermillion v. Scarbrough (In Re Vermillion)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  2. Cooley v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Emco Investment, Inc. v. VadenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API