Legal Opinion

United States v. Witmer

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 13, 1954No. 11185PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case, like its companion case of United States v. Hagaman, 3 Cir., 213 F.2d 86, which opinion is filed this day, raises two questions. One is the procedural point. This point is exactly like that in the Hagaman case in that, the registrant was notified orally, after personal appearance before the local Board, that his classification would not be changed. He was not given a written notice. But he did have knowledge of the Board’s action and he did have his. appeal. What we have said in Hagaman, and our reliance there on the Martin (Martin v. United States, 4 Cir., 190 F.2d 775) and Atkins…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  3. United States v. HagamanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Dickinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Atkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. United States v. Wayne Douglas KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Frank Mekolichick, Jr., United States of America v. David Charles WennerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. MonroeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API