United States v. Hagaman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for failing and refusing to be inducted into the armed forces of the United States after being ordered to do so.1 There is no doubt that the appellant, Hagaman, refused to be inducted into the armed forces. The defense to the criminal prosecution is that he was not obliged to obey the order to report and be inducted because the order was predicated upon Selective Service classification so improper that a court, acting within judicial province as defined in Estep v. United States, 1946, 327 U.S. 114, 66 S.Ct. 423, 90 L.Ed. 567, should…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Taffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- United States ex rel. Reel v. BadtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. WoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. David Arthur GeareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Lloyd Odin LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Clair Laverne White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Walter Leroy Shepherd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.