Shaw v. L.A. Socci, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. By their complaint, the plaintiffs sought reimbursement for the cost of a *225swimming pool cover, and for additional amounts required to complete or repair work either not performed by the defendant, or done in a deficient manner. The defendant, by its counterclaim, sought an unpaid balance due, including claimed additional options, in the amount of $6095.51. The defendant alleges that the court improperly (1) held that General Statutes § 20-429 (a) (6) is a special defense to its counterclaim, and (2) failed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Wilcox Trucking, Inc. v. Mansour Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Cookson v. CooksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Henderson v. Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blacker v. CrapoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Borderud v. Young, No. Cv 90 0105973 (Aug. 23, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Citibank v. Klahr, No. Cv93 0134685 (Mar. 15, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- City of Stamford v. Kovac, No. Cv88 0093835 S (Mar. 27, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Great Amer. Ins. v. Deming Luscomb, No. Cv90 037 85 67 S (Mar. 10, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.