Great Amer. Ins. v. Deming Luscomb, No. Cv90 037 85 67 S (Mar. 10, 1995)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM RE: ACCEPTANCE OF FACTFINDERS FINDINGS AND ARTICULATION I cannot substitute my judgment on findings for that of the factfinder, Shaw v. L.A. Socci, Inc., 24 Conn. App. 223,229 (1991). Furthermore, I wrote a Memorandum of Decision in which I sent the matter back to the factfinder for articulation as to the basis of his legal conclusions. The fact under articulated his reasons by referring to the evidence.

Now the defendant objects and in certain respects contests the factfinder's conclusions or statements…