Legal Opinion

State v. Hinnant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 2017No. COA16-1293PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*347McGEE, Chief Judge.

*786The Wilson County Board of Education ("the Board of Education")1 appeals from an order allowing a motion to set aside a bond forfeiture filed by Terrence C. Rushing ("Bail Agent") on behalf of Agent Associates Insurance, L.L.C. ("Surety"). Because the record on appeal indicates that, at the time Surety posted the bond, it had actual notice that defendant Ricky Lee Hinnant ("Defendant") had failed to appear in the same matter on at least two prior occasions, the trial court was prohibited by statute from setting aside the bond forfeiture. Accordingly, we reverse.

I. Background

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RoulhacCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. State v. RoulhacCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API