Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2012No. COA11-1227PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Harold W. Foster appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence and considering a prosecutor’s trial outline summarizing defendant’s anticipated testimony in a prosecution of a co-defendant. We agree with defendant that the outline constituted inadmissible hearsay, but hold that any error was harmless because defendant did not meet his burden of showing materiality under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-269(a)(1) (2011). We, therefore, affirm.

Facts

Defendant was indicted for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Alberti v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. TilghmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API