Legal Opinion

Dowling v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1900No. 2969PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William Hickman Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*594The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

On February 17, 1896, one James Forest entered into a contract with the city of Seattle to improve, to the established grade, Harvard Avenue Forth, from the north end of the existing improved section to the north margin of East Highland Drive, upon certain terms set forth in the contract. Afterwards, and on September 3, 1896, a supplementary and amendatory agreement to said contract for said improvement was made between the city and James Forest, in accordance with ordinance Fo. 4279 of said city, providing for the payment for said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spain v. Hamilton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. City of Seattle v. LibermanWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Seattle v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  2. Columbia Digger Co. v. RectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  3. Northwestern National Bank v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Labbe v. BernardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Illinois Surety Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API