Board of Education, Central School District No. 1 v. Byram Hills Teachers' Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Gagliardi, J.
Petitioner moves for an order staying arbitration. The factual background herein is undisputed. On October 7, 1971 petitioner, the Board of Education, and respondent, the collective bargaining agent, entered into an agreement. Article XXI, B.l thereof provides that “Probationary period will be maximum of three (3) years ”. This *622provision was not a subject of separate negotiation for the school year in question and had been incorporated in all prior contracts. Unbeknownst to the parties, subdivision 1 of section 3012 of the Education Law had been amended on April 9, 1971, effective May 9, 1971…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Mulholland v. Board of Education of Yorktown Central School District No. 2New York Supreme Court · 1972
- In re the Arbitration between Teachers Ass'n & Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pavilion Central School District v. Pavilion Faculty Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Remus v. Board of Education for Tonawanda City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000