Legal Opinion
Mulholland v. Board of Education of Yorktown Central School District No. 2
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George Beisheim, Jr., J.
This is an article 78 proceeding brought by petitioner, Charlene Mulholland, for a judgment declaring illegal the action of the respondents, the Board of Education of Yorktown Central School District No. 2 and Gordon M. Anderson, Superintendent of Schools, in terminating without a hearing petitioner’s service as a teacher of grades one through six.
By way of reply, petitioner urges that respondents’ answer is defective and should be dismissed since it fails to comply with the requirement in subdivision (d) of CPLR 7804 that “ there shall be a verified answer, which must…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- High v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Matter of High v. Bd. of Educ. of Union Free Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Kobylski v. AgoneNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- High v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Brida v. AmbachNew York Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. Board of Education of Mahopac Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- England v. Commissioner of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Baronoff v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- State Division of Human Rights v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Board of Education, Central School District No. 1 v. Byram Hills Teachers' Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.