Legal Opinion

Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-Feder

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 24, 1995No. 94-2176PublishedCited by 221 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.

In this case of first impression for this circuit, we have before us a petition filed by one parent against the other under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Edward M. Feder asserts that Melissa Ann Evans-Fed-er “wrongfully retained” their son, Charles Evan Feder (“Evan”), in the United States and requests that Evan be returned to him in Australia. Concluding that the United States was Evan’s “habitual residence”, Hague Convention, Article 3a, the district court held that the retention was not wrongful and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Bjorn Michael Rydder v. Susan Marie RydderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Application of PonathDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
  5. Feder v. Evans-FederDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by221 opinions

  1. Robert v. TessonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Walsh v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Tsai-Yi Yang v. Fu-Chiang TsuiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API