Legal Opinion
In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal Mozes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2001No. 98-56505PublishedCited by 252 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
In a case of first impression in our court, we interpret the term “habitual residence” in the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
I
Arnon and Michal Mozes are Israeli citizens. Married in 1982, they have four children, ranging in age from seven to sixteen years. Until 1997, parents and children lived in Israel, as they had their entire lives. In April 1997, with Arnon’s consent, Michal and the children came to Los Angeles. Michal had long wanted to live in the United States, and both parents agreed that the children would profit from a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Robert v. TessonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder, Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Monasky v. TaglieriSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Carmona v. CarmonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.