Legal Opinion
Highway Auto Sales, Inc. v. Auto-Konig of Scottsdale, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 20, 1996No. 3:96CV7276PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This case involves both contract and tort claims arising out of the sale of an automobile. Because complete diversity exists between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000 exclusive of interest and costs, subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending is defendant’s Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss or transfer for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Doci 5). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be granted and the case transferred to the District Court of Arizona.
In January 1996, Mr. Joseph Liber…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ex Parte Troncalli Chrysler Plymouth DodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Walker v. ConcobyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Douglas v. Modern Aero, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- FAURECIA EXHAUST SYSTEMS, INC. v. WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Norvel Ltd. v. Ulstein Propeller AsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.