Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Modern Aero, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 13, 1997No. 3:96CV7654PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum & Order
CARR, District Judge.
This is a case involving contract and tort claims arising out of the sale of an aircraft. Subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because there is complete diversity among the parties and the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds $50,000. 1 Pending, inter alia, are defendants’ Rule 12(b)(2) motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Does. 5, 8, & 18). 2 For the following reasons, defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction shall be granted, and the case shall be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ex Parte Troncalli Chrysler Plymouth DodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Walker v. ConcobyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- ALTA Analytics, Inc. v. MuussDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- United States v. Cinemark USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Weber v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.