Legal Opinion
Farrell v. American Beverage Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
There are before me for disposition two motions, one by each defendant, seeking to sever the supplemental complaint as against it, and, pursuant to rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, to dismiss each of the causes of action alleged therein.
The plaintiff Farrell commenced this action on June 26, 1951, to recover for personal injuries which resulted from the explosion on June 27,1949, of a bottle of ginger ale, which bottle was manufactured by the defendant Owens Illinois Glass Co., and filled with the carbonated liquid by the defendant American Beverage Corporation. The accident occurred…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Van Der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Weldon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Maguire v. Yellow Taxicab Corporation, SpeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Lehman v. HartkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Steinberg v. John Rosenblum, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Butler v. UBS Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Pandolfo v. AnsbroNew York Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.