Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Mayal Realty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 14, 1949PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.
The within action to recover for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate was commenced in June, 1945, against the defendants, Mayal Realty Company, Inc., and Julius Weiss, doing business as Weiss Pulp Produce Company, and issue was joined by the filing of their answers on June 27, 1945, and June 29,1945. Thereafter on January 22,1947, exactly two years from date of decedent’s death, the plaintiff served a notice of motion for leave to bring in John J. Meenan, Inc., the appellant here as an additional defendant and for leave to issue and serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Northchester Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Jackson ex dem. Bleecker v. WiseburnNew York Supreme Court · 1830
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Perez v. Paramount Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Vastola v. MaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Opperisano v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Dunning v. DunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.