Pandolfo v. Ansbro
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward G. Baker, J.
Motion by defendant, Sweeney, under subdivision 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint as to him individually, upon the ground that the cause of action therein alleged did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of the action.
Said defendant is one of three physicians who are named as defendants in the action (for alleged malpractice) “individually and as co-partners doing business as F. Paul Ansbro, M. D., F. A. C. A., associates in anesthesiology.” Two of the defendants were served with the summons and complaint in the action within two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Plumitallo v. 1407 Broadway Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Farrell v. American Beverage Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parker v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Flynn v. New York HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1962