Legal Opinion
Serhienko v. Kiker
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1986No. 11039PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment and amended judgment of the district court which dismissed their action seeking cancellation of two oil and gas leases and damages for slander of title. Defendants Russell L. Kiker, Jr., and Martin Oil Company (Martin) have cross-appealed from a portion of the amended judgment dismissing their counterclaims against the plaintiffs. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
The plaintiffs collectively own 240 of the mineral acres in Billings County described as follows:
“Township 143 North, Range 98 West of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Clopton Rogers v. OsbornTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Farmers Elevator Company v. DavidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- West Investment Co. v. MoorheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Hall v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Schank v. North American Royalties, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Horob v. Zavanna, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.