Schank v. North American Royalties, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Justice.
The plaintiffs have appealed from separate judgments in two actions to quiet the title to certain mineral interests in land on the theory that certain oil and gas leases given by the plaintiffs to the defendants terminated because of the failure of the defendants to pay delay rentals or to commence a well. Separate actions were brought by each of the plaintiffs against the same defendants. The cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial. Separate judgments were entered and separate appeals were taken. The appeals were consolidated for the purposes of argument and briefing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Willson v. Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Moody v. WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Bilby v. WireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Stevahn v. MeidingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Amoco Production Co. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Hystad v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Slawson v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.