Legal Opinion

Clopton Rogers v. Osborn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1953No. A-3824PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This is a suit to terminate an oil and gas lease. The principal questions are: Whether work done upon a first well in an unsuccessful effort to make it produce at and after the expiration *542of the primary term kept alive the lease; and if so, whether the drilling of and production from a second well commenced after the expiration of the primary term will support the lease. Our answer to the first is “Yes” and to the second “No”.

For a detailed statement of the facts see the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals at 250 S.W. 2d 296.

Before the primary term expired on September 21, 1947, Well No. 1…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garcia v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Freeman v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Morrison v. SwaimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Guinn Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. ReidTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Sunac Petroleum Corporation v. ParkesTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Woodson Oil Company v. PruettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API