Legal Opinion

Horob v. Zavanna, LLC

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2016No. 20150203PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Sandra Horob, Steven Poeckes, Steve Shae, Mike Shae and Paul Shae, the successors to the interests of John and Bernice Shae (“Horob plaintiffs”), appeal from a summary judgment deciding ownership of an oil and gas lease in favor of the successors to the interest of the William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate (collec tively “defendants”) and declaring the lease did not terminate and remains in effect. We affirm, concluding the lease remains in effect under a communitization agreement with the United States.

I

[¶ 2] John and Bernice Shae owned oil, gas and other mineral…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Moore v. Jet Stream Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Feland v. Placid Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Greer v. SalmonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kittleson v. Grynberg Petroleum CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Krebsbach v. Trinity Hospitals, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Pennington v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Feltman v. GaustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Henry Hill Oil Services v. TuftoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API