Legal Opinion

Martel v. Bulotti

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2003No. 27695PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

The district court confirmed an arbitration award in favor of Michel Martel (Martel) and entered judgment against John Bulotti (Bulotti) pursuant to the Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA). I.C. §§ 7-901 to -922 (2002). Bulotti appeals on the grounds that the district court erred in finding that he did not properly request formal arbitration and that the “award” was not confirmable pursuant to the UAA. This Court affirms the judgment of the district court on alternative grounds.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Martel contracted with Bulotti to build an addition to her home. On July…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Anderson & Nafziger v. G. T. Newcomb, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Polk v. LarrabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commercial Ventures, Inc. v. Rex M. & Lynn Lea Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. VFP VC v. Dakota Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. County of Boise v. Idaho Counties Risk Management ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Maravilla v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Berglund v. DixIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API