Legal Opinion
Anderson & Nafziger v. G. T. Newcomb, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1979No. 12906PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
On February 11, 1974, Anderson & Nafziger (plaintiff-appellant) (buyer) and G. T. Newcomb, Inc. (defendant-respondent) (seller) entered into a written contract whereby buyer ordered three pivots (circular sprinkling systems) from seller. The written agreement contained on its back several broad disclaimers of liability by seller. Buyer alleged that seller orally promised delivery of the pivots by the middle of May 1974. However the written contract gives no designated date for delivery and seller argues that there was no promised delivery date.
Approximately ten days after…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hicks v. BushNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- In Re: Gaston & Snow, Debtor, Alfred J. Bianco, as Plan Administrator to the Estate of Gaston & Snow v. Robert A. Erkins & Bernadine ErkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.