Legal Opinion

Maravilla v. J. R. Simplot Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2016No. Docket 43538PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurdick, Justice

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Joseph Jerry Maravilla and J.R. Simplot Company both appeal the Industrial Commission’s (Commission) August 11, 2015 Order on Petition for Declaratory Ruling. Ma-ravilla was injured in an industrial accident while working for Simplot, and Simplot paid Maravilla’s worker’s compensation benefits for that injury. In a separate action, Maravil-la brought suit against Idaho Industrial Contractors, Inc. (IIC), the contractor performing repairs on the area where Maravilla was injured. Maravilla and IIC settled the claim for $75,000 and Simplot claimed subrogation against…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Coghlan v. Beta Theta Pi FraternityIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Monitor Fin., L.C. v. Wildlife Ridge Estates, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Munden v. Bannock CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Alcala v. Verbruggen Palletizing Solutions, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Sharp v. Thomas Bros PlumbingIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Thompson v. Burley Inn, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API