Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1998No. 970213PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

James Ryan asks this court to overturn a trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Dan’s Foods, Inc. (“Dan’s”). Ryan argues that summary judgment is improper because a material issue of fact exists as to whether Dan’s terminated him in breach of an express or implied employment contract or in violation of public policy. We affirm.

We first turn to a review of the facts. Because this is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, “we view the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Asmus v. Pacific BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. Jill P. Mitchell Living TrustDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  4. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Commercial Real Estate Investment, L.C. v. Comcast of Utah II, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API