Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Pure Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1937No. 7397PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order directing the plaintiff in a personal injury action to present himself at the office of a physician designated by the defendant so that the physician may make a physical examination of the plaintiff and take X-ray pictures.
Section 306 of the Civil Practice Act of the state of New York provides for a physical examination of a plaintiff in an action to recover damages for personal injuries. This section reads as follows: “§ 306. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, if the defendant shall present to the court satisfactory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Kelman v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Hollister v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tutone v. New York Consolidated Railroad, New York County Courts1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fred Howland, Inc. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Del Ra v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Stoczynski v. CroftNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Callan v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.