Tutone v. New York Consolidated Railroad
New York County Courts
Motion to vacate an order for -physical examination before trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.
Plaintiff moves to vacate an order for her physical examination before trial in a negligence action because the order provides, without warrant of law, “ that the report of the physician be given to counsel for the defendant.”
The application for the examination in question was made under section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It has always seemed to me that this section conferred upon the court extraordinary powers, very closely trespassing “ on the sacred right of the individual to be let alone — inviolability of the person,” this phrase being that of Pound, J., in the case of Misak v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Wood v. Charles W. Hoffman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Mizak v. Carborundum Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
- Wood v. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelman v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Mitchell v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937
- Stoczynski v. CroftNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Callan v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Swiatlowski v. KasprzykNew York Supreme Court · 1956