Legal Opinion

Callan v. Adams

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.

The plaintiff does not object to the physical examination, but contends that it should be directed only on condition that he be furnished a copy of the physician’s report. This is the sole question before the court.

An examination of the reported decisions indicates that there is a conflict in authority. The First and Fourth Departments have taken the view that the plaintiff is not entitled to a copy of the examining physician’s report. The Second Department has held to the contrary. It does not appear that the Appellate Division of the Third Department has had occasion to pass upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Mizak v. Carborundum Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kelman v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Mitchell v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937
  5. Stoczynski v. CroftNew York Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valentine v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Del Ra v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Swiatlowski v. KasprzykNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Di Salvo v. Di GiacomoNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API