Legal Opinion

O'BAUGH v. Drilling Well Control, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1980No. 51645PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPAL A, Justice:

The dispositive question on certiorari is whether the plaintiff [worker] in a negligent-tort action was barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act from pursuing his common-law remedy. He was injured while employed by one of several contractors on a drilling job. After collecting compensation from his own employer he brought this action against another contractor at the well site. The defendant — an independent contractor — was hired to supervise the drilling of a deep gas well. The worker’s employer — another contractor — was engaged to unplug shale from the same well. The two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Harter Concrete Products, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Ishmael v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Dolese Bros. v. TollettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Lambert v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Newport v. Crane Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Wilsey, Bennett Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API