Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
These certiorari proceedings were instituted in this court by the petitioner, against whom a criminal prosecution for violation of our unlawful assembly statute, A.R.S. § 13-633 is pending in city court, for purposes of challenging the constitutionality of the statute. The constitutional challenge was presented to the lower court by a mo> tion to quash the complaint and an additional motion to quash was filed on the grounds that the complaint failed to charge an offense under A.R.S. § 13-633. A hearing was duly held and the motion to quash was denied. Reversal of this ruling is…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Yetman v. NaumannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- City of Tucson v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. AlsoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Baca v. DonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- St. Ex Rel. De Concini v. City Ct. of City of Tucson, Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.