Legal Opinion

Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 5, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 542PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

These certiorari proceedings were instituted in this court by the petitioner, against whom a criminal prosecution for violation of our unlawful assembly statute, A.R.S. § 13-633 is pending in city court, for purposes of challenging the constitutionality of the statute. The constitutional challenge was presented to the lower court by a mo> tion to quash the complaint and an additional motion to quash was filed on the grounds that the complaint failed to charge an offense under A.R.S. § 13-633. A hearing was duly held and the motion to quash was denied. Reversal of this ruling is…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Yetman v. NaumannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. City of Tucson v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. State v. AlsoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Baca v. DonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. St. Ex Rel. De Concini v. City Ct. of City of Tucson, Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API