Legal Opinion

State v. Also

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 23, 1969No. 1 CA-CR 213PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Irvin Also, was convicted of failure to wear protective headgear while operating a motorcycle, as provided in A.R.S. § 28-964 and was fined $10. He appealed to the superior court which, trying the case de novo, affirmed the fine. Defendant now appeals to this court, challenging the statute’s constitutionality. 1

A.R.S. § 28-964 provides :

“Motorcycles and motor driven cycles; required equipment; exception
“A. The operator and passenger of a motorcycle or motor driven cycle shall at all times, while operating or riding on such motorcycle or motor driven…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Everhardt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Bisenius v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Colvin v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. State v. LaitinenWashington Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. McInellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Warfel v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Arizona R. C. I. A. Lands, Inc. v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. State v. BeemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. KautzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API