State v. Also
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Irvin Also, was convicted of failure to wear protective headgear while operating a motorcycle, as provided in A.R.S. § 28-964 and was fined $10. He appealed to the superior court which, trying the case de novo, affirmed the fine. Defendant now appeals to this court, challenging the statute’s constitutionality. 1
A.R.S. § 28-964 provides :
“Motorcycles and motor driven cycles; required equipment; exception
“A. The operator and passenger of a motorcycle or motor driven cycle shall at all times, while operating or riding on such motorcycle or motor driven…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Everhardt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Bisenius v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Colvin v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- State v. LaitinenWashington Supreme Court · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McInellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Warfel v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Arizona R. C. I. A. Lands, Inc. v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. BeemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Commonwealth v. KautzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.