Legal Opinion
Joffe v. City of Huntington Park
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 2011No. B222880PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The plaintiffs, Ashley Joffe (Joffe) and Plycraft Industries, a California corporation (Plycraft) (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal from the judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court following its order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of two defendants1 to plaintiffs’ cause of action for inverse condemnation.2
This case raises issues concerning the application of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Klopping v. City of Whittier (1972) 8 Cal.3d 39 [104 *498Cal.Rptr. 1, 500 P.2d 1345] (Klopping). Plaintiffs claimed that the City defendants had effectively…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Barroso v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Williams v. Moulton Niguel Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- HPT IHG-2 Properties Trust v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Moncada v. West Coast Quartz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.