Williams v. Moulton Niguel Water Dist.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtIkola, J.
*1200Plaintiff homeowners allege the copper piping in their homes was damaged by a chemical the defendant water districts added to tap water. Adding the chemical was authorized by regulation, however, and it is undisputed that the water districts complied with all statutory and regulatory *1201standards. After a bifurcated bench trial on certain legal issues, the trial court entered judgment for the water districts, finding plaintiffs' causes of action for nuisance and inverse condemnation were preempted by federal and state laws, and *358otherwise insufficient on the merits. The plaintiff homeowners…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Loma Portal Civic Club v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 3500 Sepulveda, LLC v. Rreef America Reit II Corp BbbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Bottini v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bottini v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- City of Norwalk v. City of CerritosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- City of Norwalk v. City of CerritosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.