Legal Opinion

Powell v. Sappington

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1986No. 84-1230PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case calls for the application of choice of law principles in a workmen's compensation context. The parties ask this Court to answer the following question: Does the filing of a claim and receipt of benefits pursuant to the Alabama Workmen's Compensation Act by one who has been injured in another state give rise to an exception to the Alabama conflicts rule of lex loci delicti for purposes of that person's co-employee suit; i.e., will Alabama law control disposition of the suit rather than the law of the state of injury?

The undisputed facts of this case are as follows:

Plaintiff Billy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wardell v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Norris v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Security Insurance Group v. PlankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Wilson v. FraserDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Northeast Utilities v. PITTMAN TRUCKINGSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Abercrombie v. Nashville Auto Auction, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Baloco Ex Rel. Tapia v. Drummond Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API