Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. Nashville Auto Auction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1989No. 87-1569PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Rule 14, A.R.Civ.P., Alvin Abercrombie and Abercrombie Chevrolet, Inc., filed a third-party action against Nashville Auto Auction, Inc. ("Nashville Auto Auction"), claiming intentional or reckless misrepresentation in the sale of an automobile. The trial court entered a summary judgment for Nashville Auto Auction. The third-party plaintiffs appeal; we affirm.

The following material facts are undisputed: Nashville Auto Auction, a Tennessee corporation with its principal place of business in Nashville, Tennessee, performs auction services for automobile dealers. Alvin Abercrombie,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Powell v. SappingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Castille v. FolckLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Masoud v. Ban Credit Service AgencyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
  5. Ingram v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pelster v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. LiptonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1990
  3. Alabama Powersport Auction, LLC v. WieseSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Jones v. BallardMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API