Legal Opinion

Norris v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 21, 1984No. 83-749PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal filed by plaintiff, Chester S. Norris, Jr., from a summary judgment in a personal injury action in favor of co-employee defendants Jerry Taylor and Kenneth Hays. We affirm.

The sole issue in this case is whether Alabama or Kentucky substantive law governs, under Alabama choice of law principles, where the alleged act or omission complained of occurred in Alabama, and the injury arising therefrom occurred in Kentucky. We conclude that Kentucky substantive law governs.

The facts are not in dispute.

At the time of his injury, Norris, an Alabama resident, was employed by Quality…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Dawson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Bodnar v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Mullins v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Etheredge v. Genie Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. In re Takata Airbag Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  5. Powell v. SappingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API