Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Shoemake
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
CHANDLER, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Ultimately, this ease concerns the proper procedure by which a workers’ compensation insurer may enforce a subro-gation claim arising under Mississippi Code Section 71-3-71. Richard Shoemake was injured in Alabama but received workers’ compensation benefits from Liberty Mutual Insurance Company under Mississippi law. He brought and settled a third-party action in Alabama state court and reimbursed Liberty Mutual only the amount it was entitled to under Alabama law. Liberty Mutual, which knew of but did not join or intervene in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. Burdette Gin Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Mississippi Power Co. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Index Drilling Co., Inc. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Sawyer v. Head, Dependents OfMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clinton Williams v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Moss Point School District v. StennisMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Baldwin v. Kelly Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
- Joshua M. Martinez & Robert Martinez v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Charles E. Burnett v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Andersen v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.