Legal Opinion

United States v. Carmel

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 16, 1978No. NCM 77 1498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRANGER, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of 14 specifications variously charging him with unauthorized absence, disobedience, disrespect, and striking a petty officer. His sole assignment of error is that his pretrial restraint was illegal.

On 3 January 1977, appellant was assigned to the USS BAINBRIDGE and was charged with five minor unauthorized absences, possession of marijuana, disrespect, and a number of orders violations. At a pretrial hearing, appellant objected to being tried within 3 days of service of charges. Article 35, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 835. As his ship…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Courtney v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. HeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. WeisenmullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. PringleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. Wiggins v. GreenwaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. WhitekillerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. LambU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. SouthersU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API