Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Pringle

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 13, 1970No. 22,471PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

In this case, as in United States v Nelson, 18 USCMA 177, 39 CMR 177 (1969), we are faced with determining what remedy should be accorded an accused whose pretrial confinement was, concededly, such as to amount to “punishment” in violation of Article 13, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 813. We granted review to determine whether the law officer erred in denying a motion to dismiss.

At trial, defense counsel, citing Nelson, supra, moved for dismissal of the charges on the ground that the accused was denied due process of law by virtue of the fact…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BayhandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. O'SuchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. WestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. CruzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. AdcockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. CarmelU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API