Legal Opinion

Trujillo v. Simer

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 25, 1996No. 93-D-1787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANIEL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, Arthur and Betty Trujillo, allege that the. Defendants violated their Fourth Amendment rights during the execution of an in rem seizure warrant and the subsequent warrantless search of their real property. Plaintiffs bring this action against U.S. Customs agents, Stephen Simer, Traci Lembke and Curtis Lembke pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bur. of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (“Bivens”). Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims against the remaining Defendants…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kinslow v. RatzlaffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Gentile v. BauderSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. Padilla v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Rodriguez v. Tangipahoa Parish JailDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API