Trujillo v. Simer
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DANIEL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Arthur and Betty Trujillo, allege that the. Defendants violated their Fourth Amendment rights during the execution of an in rem seizure warrant and the subsequent warrantless search of their real property. Plaintiffs bring this action against U.S. Customs agents, Stephen Simer, Traci Lembke and Curtis Lembke pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bur. of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (“Bivens”). Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims against the remaining Defendants…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kinslow v. RatzlaffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Gentile v. BauderSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Padilla v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Rodriguez v. Tangipahoa Parish JailDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025