Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Mahr

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1976No. 1291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding involving a young attorney who was convicted of shoplifting and then reported that conviction to the Oregon State Bar.

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar, pursuant to § 3 of its Rules of Procedure referred the matter to a grievance committee for investigation and report, with findings and recommendations. That committee unanimously recommended that the proceeding be dismissed. The Board of Governors then, pursuant to §§ 3 and 4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Oregon State Bar, certified to this court the record of the conviction.

Section 4 of the Rules of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Portaluppi v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API