Legal Opinion

State v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 22, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 3128PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHMOND, Chief Judge.

The state has brought a special action to challenge the respondent court’s ordering a justice court jury trial for the real party in interest on the misdemeanor charge of shoplifting. A.R.S. § 13-673. 1 Because the issue is a recurring one, inviting guidance for justice court operation, we assume jurisdiction and deny relief.

The constitutional right to trial by jury does not extend to petty offenses. Callan v. Wilson, 127 U.S. 540, 8 S.Ct. 1301, 32 L.Ed. 223 (1888); O’Neill v. Mangum, 103 Ariz. 484, 445 P.2d 843 (1968); Rothweiler v. Superior Court, 100 Ariz. 37,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. O'NEILL v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ToomeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MahrOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bruce v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Dean v. DolnyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Baumert v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API