Legal Opinion

Sacred Heart Medical Center v. Kootenai County Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2001No. 26864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is a medical indigency ease. The issue presented for review is whether all of the outstanding bills of the applicant for county assistance, even those he has not been paying on, must be included in determining the applicant’s available resources. The Board of Commissioners for Kootenai County excluded an unrelated debt owing to the same hospital which had provided the medical services and a loan from friends that the applicant had not been making payments on and determined that there was discretionary income available after the applicant’s ordinary expenses, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. University of Utah Hospital & Medical Center v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Blaine CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bonner General Hospital v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. IHC Hospitals, Inc. v. Teton CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. Nez Perce County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. St. Luke's Regional Medical Center v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API