Legal Opinion

Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1985No. 15737PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This appeal presents several significant issues related to Idaho’s medical indigency statutes, Chapters 34 and 35 of Title 31 of the Idaho Code. The medical indigency statutes have required interpretation by the courts numerous times since enactment, because they contain some of the most inartfully drafted and unclear language in the Idaho Code. These statutes could well benefit from legislative redrafting, but in the interim it is the duty of the judiciary to give effect to the legislative intent of the statutes as best it can be ascertained.

The facts are these: Dan and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lincoln Cty. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Decker v. Homeguard SystemsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Board of Com'rs Okfuskee County v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Leonard Construction Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Caddo-Shreveport Sales & Use Tax Com'n v. OMV THROUGH DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY AND CORRS.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  2. St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. South Fork Coalition v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Allen v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. University of Utah Hospital & Medical Center v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API