Legal Opinion

University of Utah Hospital & Medical Center v. Twin Falls County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1992No. 18735PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

We must determine whether the district court properly allowed an appeal from the continuance of an administrative hearing, absent issuance of findings of fact and conclusions of law by the Board of Commissioners of Twin Falls County (“the Board”). If the appeal was proper, then we must also determine whether the possibility of prospective benefits from other governmental agencies constitutes “available resources,” thus relieving a county of the obligation to pay an indigency claim in part or in full. The University of Utah Hospital and Medical Center (“the Hospital”) also…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Davis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Architectural Woods, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bott v. Idaho State Building AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. Gooding CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. St. Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Jefferson County v. Eastern Idaho Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ware v. City of KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API